A few people have been hassling me to update my long neglected blog.
So, here’s an interview I recently did for Maisonneuve’s website.
Yann Martel was kind enough to talk with me about his new novel, Beatrice & Virgil. Although it isn’t as easy a read as his other work and may leave some of his Life of Pi fans disappointed, I think it’s definitely worth the read. Beatrice & Virgil is as much an intellectual and historical journey, questioning the ways in which we narrate the stories and facts of the Holocaust, as it is a work of fiction which features a cast of characters that includes a donkey and a monkey.
Due to length constraints I had to cut out parts of the interview. In addition to talking about literary devices and writing about the Holocaust, Martel also had lots of interesting things to say about the future of reading, eBooks and the possibility of alternative literary forms. I’ve posted that part of the interview below.
CM: I interviewed you a few years ago to talk about your illustrated version of Life of Pi. I was excited by incorporation of visual art into a literary text. I was also intrigued by the initial setup of Beatrice & Virgi as a flip book combining fiction and non-fiction. Can you talk about your attempts to veer towards unconventional, alternative storytelling and publishing?
YM: Whatever form your story takes has to compliment the story itself. There is one illustration of gestures of the horrors in Beatrice & Virgil but I believe form has to serve function.
Beatrice & Virgil still has a flip book cover in Canada. It leaves you asking which is the right way up. The flip book symbolizes the Holocaust throwing the world topsy-turvy.
CM: While I don’t think that the production of physical books will ever cease, it is undeniable that things like the iPad represent a new type of reading. I’m wondering if creating new types of physical books, like illustrated novels or flip books that combine fiction and non-fiction, could highlight the value of the off-screen reading experience?
YM: A story ultimately works because it takes you in emotionally and at the same time makes you think. The problem with people who get too clever and too experimental is that you lose your story. Plot, insight and language are important. If it’s too clever in form people are constantly reminded of that.
CM: But what about eBooks?
YM: I don’t have a problem with eBooks actually. They are good for ephemera––newspapers, magazines, genre fiction. It just means that people might only books they really love, and as a result they’ll have much better libraries. There’s a flexibility to eBooks. The print can be larger and there’s the possibility of adding sound. You could be reading a novel set in Russia and have a gentle background of Russian music that fits the story.
CM: I hadn’t thought about the oratory component to eBooks.
YM: Well, right now they all have robotic voices but we’re in the beginning stages. I love audiobooks, and that can be integrated. In ten years eBooks will cost ten dollars, they’ll be common products. But you’re right, maybe this will add another dimension to storytelling. A slightly more specialized product might be allowed to be more experimental.
Yann Martel has this website in which he posts information about the books he has been sending to Stephen Harper every two weeks for the last couple of years. While I think this is an awesome idea, I tend to think that the books Martel sends are a little lacking in the political arena. Harper could really use a couple of books that would push him in a vastly different political direction. Does reading really have that power? Probably not, but if I could force feed a text to Canada’s current Prime Minister it would be Andrea Smith’s Conquest: Sexual Violence and the American Indian Genocide. For those who haven’t read it, go get yourself a copy.
Lastly, I also want to post a link to my friend Fred’s recent post about Montreal hockey fans and their portrayal in the Montreal media because it is, well, totally rad.

Thumbs up to you for your interview, thumbs down to your friend Fred’s reductive and short-sighted post (sorry).